Native Advertising’s Effectiveness
IPG Labs loves making experiments. The NYC and SF-based team of marketers, engineers, and just plain curious types is committed to “find new ways to solve problems by applying the latest technology to marketing challenges through custom-tailored, client-led experiments.”
In a 2013 study, the company, in cooperation with in-feed advertiser, Sharethrough, completed the industry’s innaugural native ad effectiveness study, using both eye-tracking and survey-based techniques. The findings were compelling, proving that, done well, native advertising can generate engagement on par with traditional editorial content. Sometimes, yielding greater referral, social sharing, and engagement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e0/7e1e06dc6f8f96986ddad6f69d1fae44c4e4826c" alt="native1"
In fact, the study found:
-
Consumers looked at native ads 53 percent more frequently than display ads.
-
25 percent more consumers were measured to look at in-feed native ad placements (the most common editorial native ad format) than display ad units.
-
Native ads registered 18 percent higher lift in purchase intent and 9 percent lift for brand affinity responses than banner ads
-
32 pecent of respondents said the native ad “is an ad I would share with a friend of family member” versus just 19 percent for display ads.
Read the full article.